Tools

I’ve always run two AIs side by side. I’ll ask the same question to both, compare the answers, and pick the one I like better. The other gets dropped. Then I keep going with follow-up questions against the winner until I land on a final answer. It works, but it’s manual. I’m the judge every time. Stuck on an 8 hour transit with nothing better to do, it hit me: this is exactly what you do when you evaluate a prompt. You get a model to generate a result, then use another model to judge it. So why not let the AIs judge each other instead of me doing it by hand every time? ...

I have had a very specific problem at work. Whenever I need to walk someone through a process on a web app - onboarding a new team member, handing off a workflow, writing up a process doc - I end up doing one of two things: scheduling a screen share, or spending 20 minutes stitching together screenshots in a Google Doc while writing “click here, then click there” in a way that somehow still manages to be confusing. ...